![]() ![]() “So, while it’s easy to say that the Reedy Creek Special District that was established for us over 50 years ago benefited us, it’s misleading to not also consider how much Disney benefited the state of Florida.Even though Lewis Carroll has presented his “unimaginable” story as a dream of his tiny niece, he wanted to believe in it. And we built a business that employs, as we’ve said before, over 75,000 people and attracts tens of millions of people to the state.” “It basically made it easier for us, and others by the way, to do business in Florida. “There are about 2000 special districts in Florida, and most were established to foster investment in development,” Iger noted. “But since there’s been a lot said about special districts and the arrangement that we had, I want to set the record straight on that too.” “This is not about special privileges or a level playing field or Disney in any way using its leverage around the state of Florida,” the exec said. On where things are right now, Iger sought a larger perspective on the realities of Disney, Florida and any special status the Disney World owner may or may not have. They also moved to void a development agreement that Disney entered into with the special district when it was still under the company’s control.Īll of which means, as the 2024 campaign heats up, don’t be surprised if the legal battle moves to the Supreme Court where the conservative majority may have to show how pro-business they really are. The governor’s appointees on the special district that oversees Walt Disney World, meanwhile, are pursuing a state legal claim against the company. In an amended complaint filed earlier this week, Disney also warned that DeSantis and his allies “have made clear they do not care and will not stop,” citing the governor’s pledges to pursue hotel taxes and even toll roads on highways leading into the theme park resorts. Disney wants a federal judge to restore its autonomy and authority over its sprawling Florida resort property and nearby land. The company last month sued the governor, claiming that he’s been on a campaign of retribution after Disney publicly opposed a parental rights bill, often dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” law. With Iger’s remarks today in mind, the latest chapter of the Disney-DeSantis feud likely will be settled in the courts, at least to some degree. The bill will have a final Senate vote before going to DeSantis for his signature. Last week, the GOP dominated state House of Representatives passed a land use bill aimed to essentially invalidate Disney’s agreement with the Reedy Creek Improvement District in February, when the special district was still under the company’s control. Seemingly out playing the bully boy governor, Disney has tried to retain some of its autonomy over development, but DeSantis and his board appointees are challenging that too. That had allowed the company to self-govern on development decisions and to incur bonded indebtedness to finance roads and other types of infrastructure. Earlier this year, DeSantis’ championed state action to strip Disney of its control over Reedy Creek and give oversight of the special district to his own appointees. As Disney embarked on its Florida project in the 1960s, the state passed legislation to create the Reedy Creek Improvement District. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |